Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

Dutcher, Falling Options · View
Andrew Hall
Posted: Monday, December 24, 2007 12:59:44 PM

Rank: AML Member

Joined: 10/26/2007
Posts: 63
Points: 198
Location: Denton, TX
To open Jan. 18, 2008, at the Salt Lake City Gateway Megaplex. Trailer available at:
http://fallingmovie.com/

Nan McCulloch
Posted: Monday, December 24, 2007 7:26:47 PM

Rank: AML Member

Joined: 10/27/2007
Posts: 25
Points: 75
Location: Draper, UT
This is good news. Now we can get some opinions from people who have actually seen the film.
Chris Bigelow
Posted: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:23:16 AM


Rank: AML Member

Joined: 10/25/2007
Posts: 12
Points: 42
Location: Provo, UT
I looked at the trailer, and I'm actually shocked that Dave Wolverton gave this movie a positive blurb. Somehow I thought he was more conventionally Mormon in his tastes.

His blurb makes me rethink both Wolverton and the Falling movie. I just went to add the movie to my Netflix queue, but all I could find was three other movies of the exact same title that have come out in the past 2-3 years...
Mark Brown
Posted: Thursday, January 03, 2008 2:53:13 PM

Rank: AML Member

Joined: 10/25/2007
Posts: 24
Points: 72
Location: Detroit, MI
Rethink the film in what way, Chris? What was your previous opinion and what does Wolverton's praise do to it?
Marianne Hales Harding
Posted: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 12:22:34 AM


Rank: AML Member

Joined: 10/25/2007
Posts: 33
Points: 2
Location: St. George, UT
I thought it was an interesting trailer (loved how I had to click yes that I was over 17 before I could view it...that's gonna keep the under 17's out...) but I felt a little at loose ends about what in the world the story was and whether or not it would be an interesting film to watch. When we were in England and didn't have tv we would watch trailers on Apple.com for fun. I decided they needed to have an Oscar for trailers titled "Best Misdirection." :) I didn't walk away from that trailer thinking, "Wow, gotta watch that movie." I was, however, slightly intrigued. Not by the Dutcher storyline that the trailer wanted me to be intrigued by. I was more interested in the woman doing the screen test. How she's related to the Dutcher storyline we may never know (unless I rent the movie someday...).
Nan McCulloch
Posted: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 2:12:03 PM

Rank: AML Member

Joined: 10/27/2007
Posts: 25
Points: 75
Location: Draper, UT
Has anyone seen the billboard Dutcher has put up in Happy Valley for his movie Falling? The movie opens on January 18 at the Gateway. It may get some takers with Sundance Film Festival running from Jan. 17-27.
Eric W Jepson
Posted: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 4:40:20 PM


Rank: Visitor

Joined: 10/26/2007
Posts: 103
Points: 162
Location: El Cerrito, California
.

I watched the trailer online and I was intrigued, though hardly rendered eager. I will be curious to hear what people have to say.

Kathleen Dalton-Woodbury
Posted: Thursday, January 17, 2008 1:19:42 PM


Rank: AML Member

Joined: 9/12/2007
Posts: 68
Points: -210
Location: Utah
Jerry Johnston has reviewed FALLING in the new DESERET MORNING NEWS "Mormon Times" section:

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,695244646,00.html
Eric Samuelsen
Posted: Thursday, January 17, 2008 1:25:29 PM

Rank: AML Member

Joined: 10/25/2007
Posts: 21
Points: -84
Location: Provo Utah
I have seen the movie, but in rough cut, and I know that Richard has re-edited it since the version I saw and responded to. I'm definitely planning to see it this weekend; any Richard Dutcher film makes my 'must-see' list.

The version I saw was graphically violent, and if any of you are contemplating seeing it and are sensitive to film violence, I should warn you that the violence is quite troubling. I recently saw Paul Verhoeven's Eastern Promises--the film with the extended fight scene in a Turkish bath in which Viggo Mortenson--wearing his birthday suit--takes on and kills on two thugs. I found that film exceedingly violent, and I thought Falling was more graphic than that. But, again, he's reedited it.

I won't review the film until I see the version he's releasing. I'll be very interested in reading the rest of your responses to it.
Nan McCulloch
Posted: Thursday, January 17, 2008 2:49:50 PM

Rank: AML Member

Joined: 10/27/2007
Posts: 25
Points: 75
Location: Draper, UT
I read with interest Jerry Johnston's piece in the Mormon Times section of the Deseret Morning News. Although I am a Dutcher fan and the film has all the Dutcher earmarks, I must say that I agree with Johnston's perception that the film leaves one devoid of hope. I saw the private screening of Falling at the Sunstone Symposium in August and I don't intend to see it again, so, Eric and others who saw the film prior to it's release and plan to see it again. please tell me if Dutcher has made any changes in the film that could modify the loss of hope perceptiion for me.
Trevor Banks
Posted: Friday, January 18, 2008 5:47:31 AM

Rank: Visitor

Joined: 1/10/2008
Posts: 21
Points: 63
Location: Lodz, Poland
Eric,

Were you talking about Paul Verhoeven's new movie, or David Cronenberg's Eastern promises. I haven't seen either, and since you mentioned Viggo, I'm guessing it was the Cronenberg.

If you have seen the new Verhoeven, I would like to hear your response as well. Its called Black Book, isn't it? Neither film will come out here for a few months, while I know that they're both on DVD in the states.

Eric Samuelsen
Posted: Friday, January 18, 2008 11:19:20 AM

Rank: AML Member

Joined: 10/25/2007
Posts: 21
Points: -84
Location: Provo Utah
Trevor asked if the film I was describing was Verhoeven's or Cronenberg's. My apologies: it was indeed the Cronenberg film Eastern Promises. I have the Verhoeven on my Netflix queue, but it hasn't shown up yet.

I thought Eastern Promises was very strong, but ultimately somewhat disappointing. As long as it was a film about a Russian gangster who discovers his humanity, I found it very powerful. When I learned that the Mortenson character was actually an undercover cop, my interest in the story really waned. It became just another thriller. But the acting was terrific, and the depiction of the Russian mob in London very convincing and chilling.
Andrew Hall
Posted: Friday, January 18, 2008 12:29:29 PM

Rank: AML Member

Joined: 10/26/2007
Posts: 63
Points: 198
Location: Denton, TX
Dutcher puts violence in sharp focus in bloody but redemptive 'Falling'
By Sean P. Means
The Salt Lake Tribune
Article Last Updated: 01/18/2008 12:15:12 AM MST

WHERE: Megaplex 12 at The Gateway, Salt Lake City.
WHEN: Opens Friday.
RATING: R for strong brutal violence, bloody images and language.
RUNNING TIME: 83 minutes.
BOTTOM LINE: A lapsed Mormon faces a spiritual crisis on L.A.'s mean streets in this disturbing but rewarding drama.
3 out of 4 stars

'Falling' marks a radical departure for filmmaker Richard DutcherIt has been fascinating, and sometimes a bit disquieting, to watch Richard Dutcher's progress as an artist - from the LDS-friendly melodrama of "God's Army" through the more challenging and thought-provoking stories of "Brigham City" and "States of Grace."
"Disquieting" barely begins to describe Dutcher's latest film, "Falling," a dark and personal story of one man's troubled and bloody path to redemption.
Dutcher - who wrote, directed, co-produced and co-edited the film - stars as Eric, an L.A. videographer who works freelance, taping graphic accidents and crime scenes and selling the footage. It's a dirty job, and the toll of seeing all that violence is wearing on Eric, a nonpracticing Mormon, and his young wife, Davey (Virginia Reece).
When Eric gets footage of a crime in progress, he faces a double ethical dilemma. First, does he keep shooting or does he help the victim? Second, does he take the tape to the cops or sell it to a TV station? Eric's answers to both questions have devastating consequences. Meanwhile, Davey faces her own moral crisis. A struggling actress, she has the chance to get a dream role - but only if she gives in to the producer's advances.
The movie gets down and dirty on the L.A. streets as Dutcher gets a gritty handheld look from cinematographer Jim Orr. Dutcher's D.I.Y. approach extends to the lack of a music score and his own wrenching performance, which culminates in a blood-drenched finale that will shock the audience.
Actually, there's much in "Falling" that will shock the audience - especially those who know Dutcher only from "God's Army." Dutcher has traced a spiritual path for his characters that doesn't allow for easy answers, and the results are more authentic and rewarding because of it.


Over-the-top 'Falling' is bleak and unpleasant
By Jeff Vice
Deseret Morning News
Published: January 18, 2008
FALLING — ** — Richard Dutcher, Virginia Reece; rated R (violence, gore, profanity, vulgarity, brief sex, brief nudity, slurs)
"Falling" feels very much like the work of a filmmaker who's trying to push audience buttons rather than trying to tell a coherent, cohesive story.

That's really nothing new for filmmaker/local writer/director Richard Dutcher. Nearly all of his works have had their button-pushing moments (especially his 2005 "God's Army" follow-up, "States of Grace").

But nothing in that film could have prepared anyone for this dramatic thriller, which goes so far over the top that it almost turns into an unintentional comedy.

Also, the film merits its R rating. In addition to some sure-to-be-controversial religious and spiritual themes, there's strong language, sexual material and disturbingly violent, sometimes gory sequences. An ending sequence almost seems to have been torn from "Death Wish" or the more recent remakes, "Death Sentence" and "The Brave One."

In addition to his writing and directing duties, Dutcher also stars as Eric Boyle, a California-based, freelance news photographer who's having an intensely personal spiritual crisis.

Eric wants to make movies but instead finds himself filming tragedies for television news. That's left him feeling more than a little bit empty inside.

Meanwhile, Eric's wife, Davey (Virginia Reece), faces her own challenges. She's trying to make it as an actress but is unsure just how far she's willing to go to get to the top.

To be fair, it's not a horrible set-up for a movie, and you can appreciate what Dutcher is trying to do here — at least to a point. But this material is so unpleasant and relentlessly bleak and is so in-your-face that it's ridiculous.

Also, you wish he had cast someone else in the main role. While Dutcher has been decent in support in a couple of his own films, he's just not a compelling enough presence to carry this material.

Relative newcomer Reece does fare a little better, even though her character is a little unsympathetic, at least as she's written.

"Falling" is rated R for strong scenes of violence (shootings, stabbings, brawling, a beating and violence against women, including domestic violence and an implied sexual assault), graphic blood and gore, strong sexual language (profanity, vulgar slang terms and other suggestive talk), brief sexual contact, brief female nudity, and slurs based on race, gender and sexual preference. Running time: 83 minutes.


Thursday, 17 January 2008
Super violent 'Falling' a victim of its own excesses
Cody Clark - DAILY HERALD
"Falling," the new film by Richard Dutcher, begins by lifting a "grabber" from its climax, playing that scene out of context, and then flashing back to the real beginning of our story "four days earlier."

There are a lot of possible rationales for starting the movie with that particular gimmick. Since the scene's main point of emphasis, however, is for the person who's clearly our main character and recognizably played by Dutcher to, after failing to prevent a death, bitterly repeat the R-rated vulgarism, "(Fetch) you," while staring up in a direction usually associated with God, it's hard not to wonder whether the ex-patron saint of Mormon cinema isn't at least a little bit raising the middle finger to his former faith and fan base.

No, "Falling" is not another "God's Army" movie.

It's harder to pin down what, exactly, it is. The evidence of the film is that Dutcher himself couldn't quite make up his mind. It could have been about the loss and/or rediscovery of spirituality. It could have been about the disillusionment of trying to make it in the movie industry. It could have been about the emotional space between two people who try to live together but are both keeping one foot out the door. It could have been about the inner corruption of repeated exposure to violence, or the cold cynicism of our increasingly tabloid mainstream news media.

All of those ideas get some play, and any of them could have carried the movie by itself. The interrelation of them feels forced, however, and what emerges most powerfully in the end is a fairly simplistic manifesto about reaping what you sow.

The guy from the first scene is Eric Boyle (Dutcher), a freelance videographer who shoots graphic footage of accidents, crime scenes and small-scale disasters around Los Angeles that's brokered to news stations by a shady, two-bit producer (Frank Uzzolino). Eric, who's a lapsed Latter-day Saint, lives with Davey (Virginia Reece), an aspiring actress who's probably not his wife, though the precise parameters of their relationship are never specified.

One day Eric spies a trio of hoodlums harrassing an older guy and, after the situation escalates, grabs his camera and starts to film. The sale of the tape nets him $20,000, but the hoodlums aren't happy about their newfound notoriety, and the result is an increasingly violent spiral of tragic consequences.

Dutcher has a gift for realism that keeps us invested in his characters even as the movie's plot starts to fall apart. You get the sense that he spent a lot of time on details, like having the car that Eric drives, a roaring old beater SUV, be just right (which it is).

And there are potent echoes of the fiery religious conviction of his earlier films. Wherever he is in his own spiritual journey, it's clear that Dutcher still cares about questions of faith.

Oddly, the scenes in "Falling" that are clearly a passionate insider's view of the seamier aspects of the movie industry are some of the film's least involving. They're too self-contained, for one thing, and too on-the-nose. Eric meets with a movie producer whose dismissive rant about getting to the "marrow" sounds more like a screenwriting exercise than something a real person would say. And a moment where Davey is disparaged by her acting coach is both simplistic and unconvincing.

Dutcher's ground-level realism works against him after the angered hoodlums begin to wreak their vengeance with an almost supernatural ability to both find people and avoid the police. There also are moments when Dutcher contradicts his own moralizing, like when he deliberately crafts a long, slow build to our first glimpse of a pretty newscaster's horribly disfigured face.

And while there's a sense that the screenplay is meant to visit a perfect storm of unintended consequences on Eric and Davey, the extent to which their lives completely break down is still too much to be believed. And that's well before the film's disgusting, reprehensibly violent ending.

The violence of the final scene, actually, is so sickeningly graphic that it's cause to wonder what it would have taken to make the MPAA give Dutcher an NC-17 already. It's also so far beyond the scope of what we've been shown about Eric's character as to be almost laughable.

"States of Grace," Dutcher's last film before this one, understood its own intentions so thoroughly that the frenzied incoherence of "Falling" is almost more tragic than anything that happens to its characters.

C-

Features
http://www.sltrib.com/entertainment/ci_7999403
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,695244924,00.html
Eric W Jepson
Posted: Friday, January 18, 2008 1:22:51 PM


Rank: Visitor

Joined: 10/26/2007
Posts: 103
Points: 162
Location: El Cerrito, California
.

Trevor Banks wrote:
Eric,

Were you talking about Paul Verhoeven's new movie, or David Cronenberg's Eastern promises. I haven't seen either, and since you mentioned Viggo, I'm guessing it was the Cronenberg.

If you have seen the new Verhoeven, I would like to hear your response as well. Its called Black Book, isn't it? Neither film will come out here for a few months, while I know that they're both on DVD in the states.



Not the Eric you were talking to, but I want to answer this anyway since I had wondered the same thing. I'm guessing the violence otherEric was thinking of was the no-towel scene?

Anyway, I haven't seen Black Book and don't think I will. I'm quite certain it would not be mentally healthy for me to see that pretty lady bleaching her pubic hair....

Eric Samuelsen
Posted: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 2:03:29 PM

Rank: AML Member

Joined: 10/25/2007
Posts: 21
Points: -84
Location: Provo Utah
I should point out that I haven't actually seen this film in a theater. I saw a rough cut many months ago, and so may be responding to a film that is very different today. I wanted to see it this weekend, but it wasn't playing in Provo, and weather conditions made a drive to Salt Lake unadvisable.

What interests me about the film I saw is a dynamic I've also noticed in several Neil Labute films and plays. That is, these sorts of edgier works by (formerly) LDS artists tend to include language and imagery that most mainstream Mormons would reject. And yet the texts themselves seem rooted in what actually seem quite conservative LDS critiques of American popular culture.

So it is in Falling. I can't count how many times I was told as an aspiring LDS artist that the biggest challenge facing someone contemplating a career in the arts would be the temptation I would feel to compromise my standards. If I did give in to worldly peer pressure, I could suffer quite drastic consequences. And I was counseled to make certain decisions about what I would and would not do, and then stick to those decisions. Well, what is the story of Falling? An LDS husband and wife, still pursuing the Hollywood dream, who have fallen into inactivity in the Church, and who compromise their standards. He's become a news stringer, using his camera and his ability to frame a shot to wallow in the worst excesses of local news coverage, looking for footage of traffic accidents and house fires. She's agree to act in an independent film which appears to be sort of soft-core porn, and she's also chosen to sleep with the director. They've compromised their standards, in other words, and feel a little lousy about it, but still don't seem to have the moral fibre they'd need to change, to make better decisions. As a result, terrible things happen as a result. Both of them die miserably, and needlessly, after their marriage collapses.

Obviously the film includes graphically violent images and strong language that would likely offend most mainstream Mormons. But the story is a familiarly moralistic one. Really the film functioned for me as a kind of cautionary tale--if you compromise, God's going to get you but good. The ending of the film was reasonably enigmatic, and one might read it as suggesting that Christ's atonement will save this unfortunate couple. I didn't read it that way, though--I read it as punitive. They sinned, and God--enlisting the help of a street gang--punished them severely.

I remember having a similar reaction to Neil Labute's film Your Friends and Neighbors. In that film, I read the title as particularly suggestive--this was a film about Your friends and neighbors, worldly friends and neighbors. In the world, people cheat on their spouses and beat up gay people and brag about their sexual conquests. That's what happens in Sodom and Gomorrah. That's what happens in big cities, on the East coast, or in (shudder) California. And so the film struck me as oddly moralistic, despite the frank sexual language of the characters and the R rating.

What I loved about others of Richard's films, especially States of Grace, was the way he expanded a conventional LDS view of, say, the atonement, the way the film built on, but then exceeded the way we usually discuss our theology. For me, Falling was something of a step backwards. The harsh language and graphic violence may somewhat conceal what ultimately emerges as a Sunday School lesson approach to our theology. At least, that was my reading of an admittedly difficult text.

Eric Samuelsen
Andrew Hall
Posted: Monday, February 04, 2008 1:00:14 PM

Rank: AML Member

Joined: 10/26/2007
Posts: 63
Points: 198
Location: Denton, TX
Eric Snider review of Falling
http://www.ericdsnider.com/movies/falling

The Bible asks, "What shall it profit a man if he shall gain the whole world and lose his own soul?" Eric Boyle, the protagonist in Richard Dutcher's profoundly unsettling new film "Falling," has gotten the short end of the stick: He's lost his soul and hasn't gained the world, either.

Dutcher, the writer and director of Mormon cinema's "God's Army," "Brigham City," and "States of Grace," plays Eric, a lapsed Mormon who moved to L.A. to become a filmmaker but is now stuck in a life he doesn't want. Unable to break in to the business without making something shocking or titillating, Eric pays the bills by working as a freelance videographer. He drives around L.A. all day, looking for fires, crime scenes, and other juicy events to shoot, then sells the footage to news stations. He directly profits from others' misfortunes, and he hates it.

He has a wife, an aspiring actress named Davey (Virginia Reece) who also came to L.A. to make it big but who has also learned firsthand of the city's soul-crushing powers. Their relationship is loving, albeit strained by their ambitions and separate internal struggles. Both have been striving for so long that they wonder if there is any limit to what they will do to succeed.

Eric may have reached his limit, or at least he recognized the limit when he sailed past it. "Falling" covers a four-day span of his life in which he: attends the funeral of a fellow videographer who was caught in gang crossfire, earns a huge paycheck by surreptitiously filming another gangland murder, and berates himself for not intervening to help the victim. That's not even mentioning the tragic event that, as a flash-forward, is the first scene in the film.

These are times that would try any man's soul. What compounds it for Eric is knowing that things could have been different for him if he had stayed on the path of his youth: "I'm not supposed to be like this," he says simply. He was once a faithful religious man. Now, for reasons we don't know (or perhaps for no single reason at all), he has slipped away from his faith. Did he find his religion incompatible with his bottom-feeding livelihood and abandon it to make the job more tolerable? Even as he wistfully considers his former life and rues his current situation, he doesn't seem eager to return to God, even though the unspoken truth is that it would probably help him. He has assembled all the puzzle pieces, yet remains unwilling to put that last key component in place.

It's impossible not to think of Dutcher's own story, widely discussed last year when a Utah newspaper published an editorial by him in which he said he had left the Mormon Church -- not bitterly, or because he believes it to be false, but for personal spiritual reasons. He has said that the idea for "Falling" actually predates his other films, conceived back when he was in L.A. trying to become a filmmaker. But surely recent events have added some shades to the story; all of his films have been personal to some extent.

"Falling" is relentlessly bleak, a tragic, cautionary story in which a number of ugly things happen, and Jim Orr's stark cinematography even makes L.A.'s sunny skies look desolate. The two lead performances are consistently good, even in uncomfortable moments; in Eric and Davey's climactic argument, it's some of the writing I don't quite believe, not the acting. (No spoilers here, but the timing of some of the revelations feels suspect, as does Davey's initial cheerfulness, given where she's just been.)

The finale, brutally violent and almost just as brutally emotional, marks another milestone in Dutcher's growth as a proficient filmmaker and film editor. Relying solely on images, with no words or music, Dutcher conveys this major point in Eric's spiritual journey vividly, graphically, viscerally -- you feel it as much as you see it. But is it the end of Eric's journey, or a turning point leading him in a new direction? He's losing the world; can he still gain his soul?

Grade: B+

Rated R, a lot of harsh profanity, some scenes of graphic and brutal violence, a little nonsexual nudity
Association for Mormon Letters
Posted: Monday, February 04, 2008 5:43:27 PM

Rank: Administration

Joined: 9/12/2007
Posts: 196
Points: 166
Andrew Hall, why have you posted reviews in this topic when there is a topic: DUTCHER, Falling in the review section for reviews of this movie?
Wm Morris
Posted: Monday, February 04, 2008 9:12:27 PM


Rank: AML Member

Joined: 10/9/2007
Posts: 52
Points: 462
Location: Minnesota
I can't speak for Andrew, but I would note that if there is an option to send a private message via the boards by clicking on the "PM" button at the bottom of a post by the person you want to send that message to.

I'm not saying that option would have been better in this particular situation, but the post did remind me to point this out as most of the folks on this board are probably not super-familiar with forum software.


A Motley Vision: Mormon Arts and Culture
Wm Morris
Posted: Monday, February 04, 2008 9:14:12 PM


Rank: AML Member

Joined: 10/9/2007
Posts: 52
Points: 462
Location: Minnesota
Also, I think in this case Andrew is distinguishing Eric D. Snider the film critic from Eric D. Snider the AML participant. It is my understanding that the review section is for reviews by AMLers and what is listed here is reviews from newspapers and Internet sites.

But I could be wrong about that.


A Motley Vision: Mormon Arts and Culture
Andrew Hall
Posted: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 11:42:49 AM

Rank: AML Member

Joined: 10/26/2007
Posts: 63
Points: 198
Location: Denton, TX
Sorry, the review section would have been better. I have posted newspaper reviews over there. You can move them if you want.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.8 (NET v2.0) - 3/28/2008
Copyright © 2003-2008 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.
This page was generated in 1.375 seconds.