Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

Wikifikation Options · View
Eric W Jepson
Posted: Thursday, January 10, 2008 2:42:56 PM


Rank: Visitor

Joined: 10/26/2007
Posts: 102
Points: 159
Location: El Cerrito, California
.

Truth: I am far from being the most knowledgeable person here on the subject of Mormon Letters.

However: I have tried to impart what I do know to the wide world of knowledge via Wikipedia. For instance, I started the articles on Paul Dayton Bailey and Douglas Thayer and wrote the bulk of Dean Hughes's article.

Also: On June 10 of last year I made Brigham City's page suck a little less.

However: No one's touched that article since and it is, to be frank, still terrible.

I just scoured Wikipedia, looking for missing notables, and these are whom I found:

*Liz Adair
*Phyllis Barber
*Jerry Borrowman
Marilyn Brown
Ann Chamberlin
*Neal Chandler
*Michael R. Collings
Richard Cracroft
*Cheri J. Crane
Chris Crowe
Eugene England
*Judith Freeman
Terry Givens
*Sharon Downing Jarvis
*Randy Jernigan
*Clinton F. Larson
*John Lyon
*Susan Evans McCloud
*Carol Hoefling Morris
Coke Newell
*Tamra Norton
*Levi S. Peterson
*Shirley Sealy
*Linda Sillitoe
*Robert Farrell Smith
*Rick Walton
*Maurine Whipple
Carol Lynch Williams
*David Wooley
*Blaine M. Yorgason
*Brenton G. Yorgason

The asterisked names are those listed in the article LDS Fiction without articles attached; the others are ones I thought to check*. I don't even know who some of these people are--perhaps some are not notable enough to get their own pages?--but some are unfortunate. No article on Levi Peterson? I mean--should he and "The Backslider" have their own pages? What about Marilyn Brown? And what about Ann Chamberlin who is, to my knowledge, the only LDS writer to write Turkish bestsellers? These seem like pretty egregious people to leave out.

I know I still haven't forked over my money so I'm speaking as an outsider, but it seems to me that it would be a worthy goal of the AML to fill some of these holes. Not an official goal, but a goal of us as individuals who care. Someone needs to write the article on Chris Crowe--if not you, who?

Again, I'm not the most knowledgeable person here, so I can't say who should be prioritized, but surely at least some of these people desperately need articles written about them. Wikipedia is the primary encyclopedia in the world, after all. Don't we want to be represented?

Anyway, these are my thoughts / call to action. I'll keep doing what I can but, well, I've never even heard of Tamra Norton.


*I tried to avoid people who show up here on the forum (probably without complete success) for two reasons: 1) I would undoubtedly forget someone and offend them and 2) you're not supposed to write article about yourself, silly.

Eric W Jepson
Posted: Friday, January 11, 2008 2:11:44 PM


Rank: Visitor

Joined: 10/26/2007
Posts: 102
Points: 159
Location: El Cerrito, California
.

I've added new, brief articles on Ann Chamberlin and Louise Plummer.

Marny Parkin
Posted: Friday, January 11, 2008 6:51:53 PM


Rank: AML Member

Joined: 12/4/2007
Posts: 16
Points: 48
Location: Santaquin, UT
Ann Chamberlin is not Mormon.
Eric W Jepson
Posted: Friday, January 11, 2008 7:00:08 PM


Rank: Visitor

Joined: 10/26/2007
Posts: 102
Points: 159
Location: El Cerrito, California
.

She sure is. I met her at Life, the Universe and Everything.

Marny Parkin
Posted: Friday, January 11, 2008 8:01:16 PM


Rank: AML Member

Joined: 12/4/2007
Posts: 16
Points: 48
Location: Santaquin, UT
Yes, I did, too. And she is a member of my husband's writing group. I asked her specifically if she were LDS so I'd know whether to add her to my Mormon SF Bibliography (www.MormonSF.org) and she said she was not. It was a few years ago, so it is possible she's converted since then but I doubt it.
Eric W Jepson
Posted: Friday, January 11, 2008 8:03:55 PM


Rank: Visitor

Joined: 10/26/2007
Posts: 102
Points: 159
Location: El Cerrito, California
.

Oh. I wonder how I got the wrong end of that stick? We even talked about it.... But it was several years ago.

I stand corrected.

Eric W Jepson
Posted: Friday, January 11, 2008 10:27:24 PM


Rank: Visitor

Joined: 10/26/2007
Posts: 102
Points: 159
Location: El Cerrito, California
.

Marny---

In addition to mea culpa, let me also say thank you thank you. I feel rather idiotic. I haven't bandied her about much as an example of LDS lit, but I have a few times. It will nice not to be spreading lies for a change.

(note to all: when you catching me spreading lies, please stop me)

I've fixed her Wikipedia article (it only required deleting a couple category notices).

I think this whole incident really emphasizes my claim not to be the most qualified person to be doing this......

Kent Larsen
Posted: Friday, January 11, 2008 11:47:57 PM

Rank: Visitor

Joined: 10/26/2007
Posts: 13
Points: 39
Location: New York
Eric W Jepson wrote:
.I think this whole incident really emphasizes my claim not to be the most qualified person to be doing this......


Eric:

I've come to the conclusion that no one is actually qualified to do this.

We barely have any experts in Mormon Literature, to be honest, and almost all of those that we do have are compromised to one degree or another -- they have other responsibilities, other subjects they need to research or work on, and even other employment in many cases.

So, I encourage you to keep working at it. In this case, that's the only way to become an expert.

Eric W Jepson
Posted: Saturday, January 12, 2008 2:18:19 PM


Rank: Visitor

Joined: 10/26/2007
Posts: 102
Points: 159
Location: El Cerrito, California
.

Kent Larsen wrote:
In this case, that's the only way to become an expert.


That's a very good point. And I'm just geek enough to find it fun.

Also, I'm learning all sorts of neat stuff in my research about everything from Ottomans to Opera.

Eric W Jepson
Posted: Saturday, January 12, 2008 2:34:17 PM


Rank: Visitor

Joined: 10/26/2007
Posts: 102
Points: 159
Location: El Cerrito, California
.

Also:

Kent Larsen wrote:

I've come to the conclusion that no one is actually qualified to do this.

We barely have any experts in Mormon Literature, to be honest, and almost all of those that we do have are compromised to one degree or another -- they have other responsibilities, other subjects they need to research or work on, and even other employment in many cases.


I don't know how many of you remember a couple years ago when Nature published a study that showed that Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica were about equally reliable in terms of articles on the hard sciences. Anyway, the pertinent part is this: the author of the study, recognizing the essentially charitable nature of Wikipedia, encouraged his university and private-sector colleagues in the sciences to take some time to increase the stores of public-domain knowledge.

After my last comment, I was still thinking about Kent's and it occurred to me that it should be (and may be?) the same in the humanities. I imagine it is, giving the scholarly nature of many articles, and ought to be in our niche world too. I mean--my articles are far from standouts, but then I a) don't know much, b) teach full time, c) go to grad school full time, and d) am gradually growing my writing career.

Of course, I find writing Wikipedia articles a lark, so that makes it easier.

As a matter of philosophy, I find Wikipedia to be the moral future of knowledge. One of it's founders has said that the goal is to make the sum of human knowledge freely accessible--making Wikipedia all the more to our advantage in the world to come, you might say. It strikes me as a very Mormon ideal.

It's like a global party for the soul.

Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.8 (NET v2.0) - 3/28/2008
Copyright © 2003-2008 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.
This page was generated in 0.108 seconds.